Progress against the field
Between London 2024 and London Excel 2025, Helen Doyle and Siobhan Burnett lost 4:28 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 4:44 quicker, so 0:16 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
215 days between London 2025 and London Excel 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 1:46 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Relay · Mixed1:18:2039/85Beat 54%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:23:06 PB916/1887Beat 52%
↑ 215 days after London 2025, with Siobhan Burnett 1:46 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:23 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:09 faster for everyone, so 1:46 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:09 faster This pair0:23 faster -
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:23:29545/1118Beat 51%
↑ 155 days after London 2024, with Siobhan Burnett 2:42 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:42 behind the field: 0:07 slower on the clock, against 2:35 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:35 faster This pair0:07 slower -
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:23:22250/517Beat 52%