Progress against the field
From Dublin 2024 to Dublin 2025, the field gained 1:18 on Caoimhe Henry.
Over the same races everyone got 4:29 quicker, so 3:11 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
8 races · 8 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Women1:23:51 PB36/76Beat 53%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:10:44308/1474Beat 79%
↑ 202 days after Berlin 2025, with Mark Doyle 2:17 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:45 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:28 slower for everyone: 2:17 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:28 slower This pair2:45 slower -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Open · Women1:15:33 PB22/235Beat 91%
↑ 362 days after Dublin 2024 1:18 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:11 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:29 faster for everyone, so 1:18 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:29 faster This athlete3:11 faster -
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:07:59 PB213/892Beat 76%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:12:08 PB34/264Beat 87%
-
Dublin15 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:18:4450/548Beat 91%
-
Madrid26 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women1:21:2270/444Beat 84%
-
St. GallenDate unknownIndividual Open · Women1:21:17104/533Beat 81%