Progress against the field
From London 2024 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 6:10 on Lorna Lyon.
Over the same races everyone got 8:31 quicker, so 2:21 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 215 days between London 2025 and London Excel 2025, cost 4:59 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Women1:51:05 PB132/148Beat 11%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:34:06939/1542Beat 39%
↑ 215 days after London 2025 4:59 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:32 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:27 faster for everyone: 4:59 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:27 faster This athlete1:32 slower -
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:32:34 PB733/1368Beat 46%
↑ 52 days after Glasgow 2025 0:14 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:56 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:10 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:14 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:10 faster This athlete0:56 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:33:30359/649Beat 45%
↑ 103 days after London 2024 0:57 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:57 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:54 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:57 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:54 faster This athlete2:57 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:36:27491/940Beat 48%