Progress against the field
Between London 2023 and Glasgow 2025, Eilidh Bellshaw and Jenna Ross lost 5:58 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 4:57 quicker, so 1:01 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 375 days between Glasgow 2024 and Glasgow 2025, cost 4:28 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:18:51 PB27/318Beat 92%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:06:49 PB52/559Beat 91%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:13:21105/1051Beat 90%
↑ 375 days after Glasgow 2024, with Jenna Ross 4:28 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:33 faster on the clock, yet the race was 5:01 faster for everyone, so 4:28 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:01 faster This pair0:33 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Women1:13:5475/1029Beat 93%
↑ 97 days after London 2023, with Jenna Ross 1:30 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:34 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:04 slower for everyone: 1:30 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:04 slower This pair1:34 slower -
London26 Nov 2023Doubles Open · Women1:12:20 PB123/1096Beat 89%