Progress against the field
From Manchester 2025 to Glasgow 2026, the field gained 5:01 on Jamie Mcglinchey.
The clock says 0:11 slower, but the races themselves got 4:50 quicker for everyone.
364 days between Glasgow 2025 and Glasgow 2026 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 1:18 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · MenDNF—
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:03:5047/1452Beat 97%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025 1:18 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:18 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:36 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:18 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:36 faster This athlete0:18 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:01:10 PB93/794Beat 88%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:11:25 PB128/176Beat 27%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:04:0861/1445Beat 96%
↑ 47 days after Manchester 2025 3:43 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:29 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:14 faster for everyone: 3:43 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:14 faster This athlete0:29 slower -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Men1:03:39 PB256/1191Beat 79%