Progress against the field
Mark Tindal has gained 2:50 on the field from Glasgow 2024 to Glasgow 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 9:18 quicker, so 12:08 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 364 days between Glasgow 2025 and Glasgow 2026, cost 1:37 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:01:09 PB25/66Beat 62%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:05:2376/1452Beat 95%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025 1:37 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:01 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:36 faster for everyone: 1:37 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:36 faster This athlete0:01 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men59:27 PB73/1105Beat 93%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:05:22 PB81/1588Beat 95%
↑ 138 days after Birmingham 2024 8:50 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
8:50 better than the field: 14:11 faster on the clock, against 5:21 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →5:21 faster This athlete14:11 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:15 PB160/494Beat 68%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:19:33276/816Beat 66%
↑ 237 days after Glasgow 2024 4:23 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:23 behind the field: 2:02 slower on the clock, against 2:21 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:21 faster This athlete2:02 slower -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Men1:17:31436/1784Beat 76%