Progress against the field
From Dublin 2024 to Glasgow 2026, the field gained 2:17 on Charlotte Maggs.
The clock says 3:45 faster, but the races themselves got 6:02 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:08:1710/1084Beat 99%
↑ 140 days after Birmingham 2025 2:17 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:12 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:05 faster for everyone: 2:17 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:05 faster This athlete0:12 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:15 PB18/297Beat 94%
↑ 453 days after Birmingham 2024, with Sam Cessford 3:16 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:09 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:53 faster for everyone, so 3:16 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:53 faster This pair6:09 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:08:05 PB6/829Beat 99%
↑ 341 days after Dublin 2024 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 3:57 faster on the clock, against 3:57 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:57 faster This athlete3:57 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Women1:10:04 PB78/857Beat 91%
-
Dublin15 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:12:0210/548Beat 98%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:09:2441/494Beat 92%