Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2024 and Glasgow 2026, Kea Pye lost 1:25 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 7:42 quicker, so 6:17 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 362 days between Birmingham 2024 and Birmingham 2025, cost 2:57 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:22:51 PB232/301Beat 23%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:11:20 PB24/1084Beat 98%
↑ 140 days after Birmingham 2025 1:22 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:43 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:05 faster for everyone, so 1:22 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:05 faster This athlete0:43 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:12:0332/829Beat 96%
↑ 362 days after Birmingham 2024 2:57 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:36 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:33 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:57 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:33 faster This athlete1:36 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:05:26 PB15/1051Beat 99%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women1:13:3941/846Beat 95%
↑ 237 days after Glasgow 2024 2:54 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:58 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:04 faster for everyone, so 2:54 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:04 faster This athlete3:58 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Women1:17:3788/816Beat 89%