Progress against the field
From Malaga 2025 to Glasgow 2026, the field gained 3:16 on Sarah McLelland.
The clock says 0:47 slower, but the races themselves got 2:29 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Relay · Women1:09:2814/126Beat 89%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:12:1835/1084Beat 97%
↑ 355 days after Malaga 2025 3:16 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:16 behind the field: 0:47 slower on the clock, against 2:29 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:29 faster This athlete0:47 slower -
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:06:51 PB9/514Beat 98%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:11:31 PB6/281Beat 98%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:04:51 PB42/861Beat 95%
↑ 138 days after Birmingham 2024, with Roddy Mclelland 0:53 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:11 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:04 faster for everyone, so 0:53 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:04 faster This pair3:11 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:08:0232/494Beat 94%