Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2024 and Glasgow 2026, Ailsa Currie lost 1:49 to the field.
The clock says 1:15 faster, but the races themselves got 3:04 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
4 races · 3 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:11:13 PB84/500Beat 83%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025, with Barry McConnochie 2:10 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:28 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:18 faster for everyone, so 2:10 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:18 faster This pair3:28 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:13:44 PB47/1084Beat 96%
↑ 739 days after Glasgow 2024 1:49 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:15 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:04 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:49 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:04 faster This athlete1:15 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:14:41252/861Beat 71%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Women1:14:5951/816Beat 94%