Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2025 to Birmingham 2025, the field gained 13:51 on Michelle Locke and Mark Locke.
Over the same races everyone got 1:26 quicker, so 12:25 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women2:10:02 PB1015/1084Beat 6%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:49:10919/954Beat 4%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025, with Mark Locke 13:51 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
12:25 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:26 faster for everyone: 13:51 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:26 faster This pair12:25 slower -
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:31:25 PB817/1118Beat 27%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:36:45 PB740/841Beat 12%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Relay · Women1:29:01101/145Beat 30%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:34:55309/397Beat 22%