Progress against the field
Between Dublin 2024 and Glasgow 2025, Amber Hunter kept pace with the field.
Over the same races everyone got 3:19 quicker, so 3:32 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:39:57 PB39/43Beat 9%
-
Madrid27 Nov 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:50:21137/139Beat 1%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:48:36 PB669/830Beat 19%
↑ 117 days after Dublin 2024 0:13 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:32 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:19 faster for everyone, so 0:13 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:19 faster This athlete3:32 faster -
Dublin15 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:52:08461/548Beat 16%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Women1:25:38 PB406/1029Beat 61%
↑ 385 days after Glasgow 2023, with Nicole Mckean 4:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:55 faster on the clock in a race that was 1:05 slower for everyone: 4:00 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:05 slower This pair2:55 faster -
Glasgow11 Feb 2023Doubles Open · Women1:28:33275/381Beat 28%