Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2024 and Glasgow 2025, Darren Gray lost 8:17 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 5:21 quicker, so 2:56 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 5 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:02:35 PB121/917Beat 87%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:01:1373/202Beat 64%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025, with David Paterson 1:58 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:58 behind the field: 2:41 slower on the clock, against 0:43 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:43 slower This pair2:41 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:12:54336/1588Beat 79%
↑ 138 days after Birmingham 2024 8:17 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:56 slower on the clock in a race that was 5:21 faster for everyone: 8:17 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:21 faster This athlete2:56 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Pro · Men58:32 PB35/143Beat 76%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:09:5587/122Beat 29%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:09:58 PB88/816Beat 89%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Men1:05:43159/787Beat 80%