Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2025 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 1:46 on Pete Hallett.
Over the same races everyone got 1:55 quicker, so 0:09 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
9 races · 6 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:18:00 PB182/202Beat 10%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:17:281298/1815Beat 29%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Jon Clark 9:03 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:12 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:51 faster for everyone: 9:03 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:51 faster This pair7:12 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:25:50 PB355/467Beat 24%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 1:46 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:09 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:55 faster for everyone, so 1:46 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:55 faster This athlete0:09 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Relay · Men1:02:4726/54Beat 52%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:10:16 PB517/1099Beat 53%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Men1:25:59109/137Beat 20%
-
Hamburg2 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Men1:27:0761/78Beat 22%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Pro · Men1:35:1598/112Beat 13%
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:38:46 PB1025/1206Beat 15%