Progress against the field
Between Malaga 2025 and Birmingham 2025, Mia Stephenson and Claire Aselford lost 1:22 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 1:16 quicker, so 0:06 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:11:04 PB195/1198Beat 84%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:26:431064/1474Beat 28%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:11:5277/904Beat 92%
↑ 215 days after Malaga 2025, with Claire Aselford 1:22 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:06 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:16 faster for everyone: 1:22 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:16 faster This pair0:06 slower -
Hamburg2 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:13:28161/711Beat 77%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:11:46 PB55/514Beat 89%