Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2025 and Dublin 2025, Lucy Bannatyne lost 1:43 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 4:38 quicker, so 2:55 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:16:11 PB35/279Beat 88%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:16:10 PB354/1198Beat 71%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Open · Women1:26:53 PB243/539Beat 55%
↑ 245 days after Glasgow 2025 1:43 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:55 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:38 faster for everyone, so 1:43 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:38 faster This athlete2:55 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:29:48382/830Beat 54%
-
Madrid26 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:09246/584Beat 58%
↑ 238 days after Glasgow 2024, with Hector Hanley 6:42 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:42 better than the field: 8:22 faster on the clock, against 1:40 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:40 faster This pair8:22 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:27:31495/850Beat 42%