Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2024 and Glasgow 2025, Lowra McGonagle and Rebecca Callander lost 5:36 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 5:10 quicker, so 0:26 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
252 days between Glasgow 2024 and Paris 2024 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 3:04 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:26 PB435/1198Beat 64%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:18:39252/1051Beat 76%
↑ 123 days after Paris 2024, with Rebecca Callander 2:32 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:05 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:37 faster for everyone, so 2:32 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:37 faster This pair2:05 faster -
Paris9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:20:44158/698Beat 77%
↑ 252 days after Glasgow 2024, with Rebecca Callander 3:04 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:31 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:33 faster for everyone: 3:04 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:33 faster This pair2:31 slower -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Women1:18:13 PB167/1029Beat 84%