Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2024 to Glasgow 2026, Nicola Burns-Donnelly and Scott Donnelly got 0:25 faster than the field.
The clock says 5:47 faster, but the races themselves got 5:22 quicker for everyone.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 364 days between Glasgow 2025 and Glasgow 2026, still ended 2:06 ahead of the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:20:19 PB524/1198Beat 56%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025, with Scott Donnelly 2:06 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:24 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:18 faster for everyone, so 2:06 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:18 faster This pair3:24 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:23:43512/861Beat 41%
↑ 138 days after Birmingham 2024, with Scott Donnelly 1:41 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:23 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:04 faster for everyone, so 1:41 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:04 faster This pair2:23 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:26:06633/894Beat 29%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:31:17582/850Beat 32%