Progress against the field
Jim Froud-Williams and Catherine Froud-Williams have dropped 5:53 behind the field from Glasgow 2024 to Glasgow 2026.
The clock says 1:55 faster, but the races themselves got 7:48 quicker for everyone.
364 days between Glasgow 2025 and Glasgow 2026 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 6:17 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:28:07784/1198Beat 35%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025, with Catherine Froud-Williams 6:17 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:17 behind the field: 4:59 slower on the clock, against 1:18 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:18 faster This pair4:59 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:23:08 PB493/861Beat 43%
↑ 138 days after Birmingham 2024, with Catherine Froud-Williams 2:58 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:06 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:04 faster for everyone, so 2:58 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:04 faster This pair1:06 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:24:14270/494Beat 45%
↑ 237 days after Glasgow 2024, with Catherine Froud-Williams 3:22 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:22 better than the field: 5:48 faster on the clock, against 2:26 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:26 faster This pair5:48 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:30:02552/850Beat 35%