Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2024 to Glasgow 2026, the field gained 8:00 on Fraser Ellison and Rachel Burgess.
Over the same races everyone got 5:25 quicker, so 2:35 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
375 days between Glasgow 2024 and Glasgow 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 4:51 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
3 races · 3 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:29:14828/1198Beat 31%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025, with Rachel Burgess 3:09 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:51 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:18 faster for everyone: 3:09 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:18 faster This pair1:51 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:27:23597/841Beat 29%
↑ 375 days after Glasgow 2024, with Rachel Burgess 4:51 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:51 behind the field: 0:44 slower on the clock, against 4:07 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:07 faster This pair0:44 slower -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:26:39 PB484/850Beat 43%