Progress against the field
Michael Sciberras and Adam Cusack have gained 1:03 on the field from Glasgow 2023 to Glasgow 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 5:38 quicker, so 6:41 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
385 days between Glasgow 2023 and Glasgow 2024 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 4:10 better than the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:09:22 PB344/917Beat 63%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025, with Adam Cusack 2:10 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:52 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:42 faster for everyone, so 2:10 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →0:42 faster This pair2:52 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:12:14549/947Beat 42%
↑ 375 days after Glasgow 2024, with Adam Cusack 5:17 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:54 slower on the clock in a race that was 4:23 faster for everyone: 5:17 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:23 faster This pair0:54 slower -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Men1:11:20348/787Beat 56%
↑ 385 days after Glasgow 2023, with Adam Cusack 4:10 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:10 better than the field: 4:43 faster on the clock, against 0:33 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:33 faster This pair4:43 faster -
Glasgow11 Feb 2023Doubles Open · Men1:16:03249/343Beat 27%