Progress against the field
From Cardiff 2025 to Glasgow 2026, Stewart Fulton and Fraser Milne have moved with the field: what changed on the clock changed for everyone.
Over the same races everyone got 0:54 slower, so 0:42 slower on the clock looks worse than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Men, with Fraser Milne, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:16:19541/917Beat 41%
↑ 285 days after Cardiff 2025, with Fraser Milne 0:12 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:42 slower on the clock, but the race was 0:54 slower for everyone, so this was 0:12 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:54 slower This pair0:42 slower -
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Men1:15:37 PB428/563Beat 24%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:35:14908/947Beat 4%
↑ 375 days after Glasgow 2024, with Ian Fulton 18:00 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
13:37 slower on the clock in a race that was 4:23 faster for everyone: 18:00 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:23 faster This pair13:37 slower -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:29:28 PB1168/1916Beat 39%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Men1:21:37617/787Beat 22%
-
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Doubles Open · Mixed1:26:16 PB237/352Beat 33%