Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2025 and Glasgow 2026, Gary Orr and Sheryl Findlay kept pace with the field.
The clock says 0:53 faster, but the races themselves got 1:04 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Mixed, with Sheryl Findlay, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:57 PB187/460Beat 59%
↑ 140 days after Birmingham 2025, with Sheryl Findlay 0:11 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:53 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:04 faster for everyone, so 0:11 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:04 faster This pair0:53 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:17:44 PB576/917Beat 37%
↑ 97 days after London Excel 2025, with David Orr 5:52 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:20 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:32 slower for everyone: 5:52 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:32 slower This pair5:20 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:23:041518/1815Beat 16%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:50511/954Beat 46%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:32:48 PB780/966Beat 19%