Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2024 and Glasgow 2026, Nick Chamley and Matt Holgate lost 2:45 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 3:52 quicker, so 1:07 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
362 days between Birmingham 2024 and Birmingham 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 2:33 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:18:41 PB600/917Beat 35%
↑ 140 days after Birmingham 2025, with Matt Holgate 0:12 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:43 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 0:55 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:12 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:55 faster This pair0:43 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:19:24877/1177Beat 26%
↑ 362 days after Birmingham 2024, with Matt Holgate 2:33 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:24 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:57 faster for everyone, so 2:33 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:57 faster This pair0:24 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:22:39781/947Beat 18%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Men1:19:48668/875Beat 24%