Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2024 and Glasgow 2026, Scott Boyle and Stuart Milne lost 8:59 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 5:05 quicker, so 3:54 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
375 days between Glasgow 2024 and Glasgow 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 1:48 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 3 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:17:12 PB158/460Beat 66%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:25:06751/917Beat 18%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025, with Stuart Milne 7:11 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:11 behind the field: 6:29 slower on the clock, against 0:42 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:42 faster This pair6:29 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:18:37 PB782/1105Beat 29%
↑ 375 days after Glasgow 2024, with Stuart Milne 1:48 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:35 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:23 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:48 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:23 faster This pair2:35 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Men1:21:12607/787Beat 23%