Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2025 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 3:24 on Graham Johnson.
Over the same races everyone got 2:34 quicker, so 0:50 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:37:09577/605Beat 5%
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:16:44123/359Beat 66%
↑ 598 days after Glasgow 2025 3:24 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:50 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:34 faster for everyone: 3:24 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:34 faster This athlete0:50 slower -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:07 PB178/500Beat 64%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:26:10191/243Beat 21%
↑ 140 days after Birmingham 2025, with Andrew Tabner 8:43 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:38 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:55 faster for everyone, so 8:43 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →0:55 faster This pair9:38 faster -
Madrid27 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Men1:09:52 PB364/1029Beat 65%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:35:481053/1099Beat 4%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:15:54 PB476/1588Beat 70%