Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2025 to Glasgow 2026, the field gained 0:20 on Deborah Hughes and Kim Cree.
The clock says 0:30 faster, but the races themselves got 0:50 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Kim Cree, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:24:02 PB239/301Beat 21%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:36:17311/487Beat 36%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025, with Kim Cree 0:20 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:30 faster on the clock, yet the race was 0:50 faster for everyone, so 0:20 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:50 faster This pair0:30 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:35:01 PB682/904Beat 25%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025, with Katherine Simpson 3:02 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:02 better than the field: 5:33 faster on the clock, against 2:31 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:31 faster This pair5:33 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:36:47838/1051Beat 20%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:40:34662/796Beat 17%
-
Copenhagen23 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:20:16 PB233/337Beat 31%