Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2024 to Toulouse 2025, the field gained 1:18 on John O'Reilly.
The clock says 5:20 faster, but the races themselves got 6:38 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:07:38 PB57/460Beat 88%
-
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:09:1199/344Beat 71%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:50:22384/398Beat 4%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men54:50 PB20/947Beat 98%
-
Toulouse8 Feb 2025Individual Open · Men1:08:01143/1789Beat 92%
↑ 85 days after Dublin 2024 1:28 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:10 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:18 faster for everyone: 1:28 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:18 faster This athlete0:10 slower -
Dublin15 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:07:51 PB72/1221Beat 94%
↑ 258 days after Glasgow 2024 0:10 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:30 faster on the clock, and the race was 5:20 faster for everyone, so 0:10 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →5:20 faster This athlete5:30 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Men1:13:21258/1784Beat 86%