Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2025 to Glasgow 2026, Chandler Donnelly and Erin Mceleny got 5:42 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 5:59 quicker, so 11:41 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The largest gain on the field came from Rome 2025 → London Excel 2025: 4:51 in 69 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:14:48 PB129/460Beat 72%
↑ 97 days after London Excel 2025, with Erin Mceleny 0:48 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:28 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:20 slower for everyone: 0:48 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:20 slower This pair0:28 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:15:16477/1372Beat 65%
↑ 69 days after Rome 2025, with Erin Mceleny 4:51 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:10 faster on the clock, and the race was 4:19 faster for everyone, so 4:51 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →4:19 faster This pair9:10 faster -
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:24:26472/655Beat 28%
↑ 198 days after Glasgow 2025, with Erin Mceleny 0:03 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 2:03 faster on the clock, against 2:00 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:00 faster This pair2:03 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:26:29573/861Beat 33%