Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2025 and Glasgow 2026, Claire Pollard and Pamela Crawley lost 1:55 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:57 quicker, so 1:02 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:12:28 PB103/1618Beat 94%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026, with Pamela Crawley 1:55 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:14 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:09 faster for everyone, so 1:55 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:09 faster This pair0:14 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:12:42130/1155Beat 89%
↑ 315 days after Glasgow 2025, with Pamela Crawley 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:48 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:48 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →0:48 faster This pair0:48 faster -
Malaga21 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:32:29 PB274/510Beat 46%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:13:3081/796Beat 90%