Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2025 and Glasgow 2026, Kate Brereton and Donna Wilcox lost 2:06 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 1:57 quicker, so 0:09 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 215 days between London 2025 and London Excel 2025, cost 6:41 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:20:52405/1618Beat 75%
↑ 97 days after London Excel 2025, with Donna Wilcox 2:59 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:13 faster on the clock in a race that was 1:46 slower for everyone: 2:59 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:46 slower This pair1:13 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:22:05854/1887Beat 55%
↑ 215 days after London 2025, with Donna Wilcox 6:41 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:32 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:09 faster for everyone: 6:41 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:09 faster This pair4:32 slower -
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:17:33 PB299/1118Beat 73%
↑ 52 days after Glasgow 2025, with Donna Wilcox 1:36 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:10 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:34 faster for everyone, so 1:36 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:34 faster This pair3:10 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:20:43333/1051Beat 68%