Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2025 and London Excel 2025, Alison Lennie and Katrina Baillie lost 3:37 to the field.
The clock says 1:24 faster, but the races themselves got 5:01 quicker for everyone.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 224 days between Glasgow 2025 and Birmingham 2025, cost 2:17 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Rome23 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:49 PB120/248Beat 52%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:26:05671/1618Beat 59%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:21:32 PB600/1599Beat 63%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Katrina Baillie 1:20 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:10 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:30 faster for everyone, so 1:20 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:30 faster This pair1:10 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:22:42370/904Beat 59%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025, with Katrina Baillie 2:17 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:14 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:31 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:17 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:31 faster This pair0:14 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:22:56281/796Beat 65%