Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2024 to Glasgow 2026, the field gained 16:39 on Shanice Shek and Sara Reid.
Over the same races everyone got 7:10 quicker, so 9:29 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
364 days between Glasgow 2025 and Glasgow 2026 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 11:09 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:37:141158/1618Beat 28%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025, with Sara Reid 11:09 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
10:19 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:50 faster for everyone: 11:09 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:50 faster This pair10:19 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:26:55549/1051Beat 48%
↑ 103 days after London 2024, with Sara Reid 4:04 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:04 behind the field: 0:51 slower on the clock, against 3:13 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:13 faster This pair0:51 slower -
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:26:04 PB304/517Beat 41%
↑ 272 days after Glasgow 2024, with Sara Reid 1:26 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:41 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:07 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:26 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:07 faster This pair1:41 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Women1:27:45477/1029Beat 54%