Progress against the field
Between Madrid 2025 and Katowice 2026, Kelvin Fang lost 3:16 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 6:45 quicker, so 3:29 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Katowice21 Feb 2026Individual Open · Men1:22:26379/859Beat 56%
↑ 31 days after Manchester 2026 1:41 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:35 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:16 faster for everyone, so 1:41 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:16 faster This athlete2:35 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:25:01272/529Beat 49%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 1:35 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:35 behind the field: 2:42 slower on the clock, against 1:07 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:07 slower This athlete2:42 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:22:19 PB1361/2779Beat 51%
↑ 7 days after Madrid 2025 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 3:36 faster on the clock, against 3:36 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:36 faster This athlete3:36 faster -
Madrid27 Nov 2025Individual Open · Men1:25:55691/1312Beat 47%
-
Poznan2 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:33:07552/776Beat 29%