Progress against the field
From Manchester 2025 to Valencia 2025, Danielle Leader got 1:55 faster than the field.
The clock says 7:51 faster, but the races themselves got 5:56 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
8 races · 8 events
-
Katowice21 Feb 2026Individual Open · Women1:12:11 PB24/486Beat 95%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:29 PB57/824Beat 93%
-
Valencia17 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:17:2431/317Beat 90%
↑ 167 days after London 2025 1:43 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:43 better than the field: 3:37 faster on the clock, against 1:54 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:54 faster This athlete3:37 faster -
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:21:01304/1368Beat 78%
↑ 52 days after Glasgow 2025 0:53 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:17 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:10 faster for everyone, so 0:53 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:10 faster This athlete0:17 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:21:18136/649Beat 79%
↑ 47 days after Manchester 2025 1:05 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:05 better than the field: 3:57 faster on the clock, against 2:52 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:52 faster This athlete3:57 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Women1:25:15170/539Beat 69%
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:14:24 PB84/486Beat 83%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:14:24127/973Beat 87%