Progress against the field
From Paris 1 2025 to Bordeaux 2025, Emilie Aubry and Julie Nivaux got 0:22 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 4:21 quicker, so 4:43 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
187 days between Paris 1 2025 and Paris 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 2:33 better than the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Bordeaux20 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:18:27 PB172/865Beat 80%
↑ 29 days after Paris 2025, with Julie Nivaux 2:11 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:21 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:32 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:11 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:32 faster This pair2:21 faster -
Paris22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:20:48180/804Beat 78%
↑ 187 days after Paris 1 2025, with Julie Nivaux 2:33 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:22 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:11 slower for everyone: 2:33 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:11 slower This pair2:22 faster -
Paris 118 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Women1:23:10323/656Beat 51%
-
NiceDate unknownDoubles Open · Mixed1:13:21 PB318/1117Beat 72%