Progress against the field
From London Excel 2025 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 0:56 on Tom Fisher.
The clock says 0:27 faster, but the races themselves got 1:23 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
8 races · 7 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:25:05 PB343/646Beat 47%
↑ 331 days after London Excel 2025 0:56 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:27 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:23 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:56 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:23 faster This athlete0:27 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:04:29 PB190/794Beat 76%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Relay · Men1:01:0031/69Beat 55%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:25:321549/2771Beat 44%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:05:43310/1177Beat 74%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:24:37 PB529/693Beat 24%
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:14:19472/719Beat 34%
↑ 15 days after Birmingham 2024, with Tom Cantoni 0:47 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:47 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:34 faster for everyone, so 0:47 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:34 faster This pair0:47 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Men1:15:06528/875Beat 40%