Progress against the field
From London Excel 2025 to Manchester 2026, the field gained 6:54 on Isobelle Matthews.
The clock says 9:13 slower, but the races themselves got 2:19 slower for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Women1:41:2163/83Beat 24%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 6:54 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:54 behind the field: 9:13 slower on the clock, against 2:19 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:19 slower This athlete9:13 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Women1:32:08 PB180/283Beat 36%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:30:08597/904Beat 34%
↑ 362 days after Birmingham 2024, with Kamila Miltko 0:57 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:14 faster on the clock, and the race was 4:17 faster for everyone, so 0:57 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →4:17 faster This pair5:14 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:32:27 PB176/380Beat 54%
-
Belgium5 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Women1:28:54 PB387/713Beat 46%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:35:22781/973Beat 20%