Progress against the field
From Manchester 2025 to London Excel 2025, Tanya Skelton got 5:03 faster than the field.
The clock says 9:14 faster, but the races themselves got 4:11 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Women1:52:12 PB72/83Beat 13%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:34:12 PB943/1542Beat 39%
↑ 314 days after Manchester 2025 5:03 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:14 faster on the clock, and the race was 4:11 faster for everyone, so 5:03 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →4:11 faster This athlete9:14 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:27:11 PB402/796Beat 50%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Women1:43:26403/539Beat 25%
-
Dublin15 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:35:58308/548Beat 44%
↑ 21 days after Birmingham 2024 0:50 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:50 better than the field: 5:38 faster on the clock, against 4:48 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:48 faster This athlete5:38 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women1:41:36570/846Beat 33%