Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2025 to Manchester 2026, the field gained 0:19 on David Maddox.
The clock says 0:44 faster, but the races themselves got 1:03 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · MenDNF—
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:01:39 PB29/1463Beat 98%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2025 0:19 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:44 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:03 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:19 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:03 faster This athlete0:44 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Men55:32 PB21/312Beat 93%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:02:2341/1821Beat 98%
-
Copenhagen14 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men58:36 PB52/736Beat 93%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:00:1393/1105Beat 92%
↑ 138 days after Birmingham 2024, with Reiss Davenport 0:23 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:28 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:51 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:23 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:51 faster This pair2:28 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Men1:02:4188/875Beat 90%