Progress against the field
From Cardiff 2025 to Manchester 2026, Francesca Mccann got 0:17 faster than the field.
The clock says 3:38 faster, but the races themselves got 3:21 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:20:31 PB158/825Beat 81%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2025 1:00 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:35 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:35 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:00 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:35 faster This athlete0:35 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:21:06149/829Beat 82%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025 1:17 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:03 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:46 faster for everyone, so 1:17 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:46 faster This athlete3:03 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:24:09126/400Beat 69%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:12:02 PB116/1118Beat 90%
↑ 99 days after Manchester 2025, with Annabelle Memory 2:45 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:13 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:28 faster for everyone, so 2:45 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →3:28 faster This pair6:13 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Women1:18:15251/857Beat 71%