Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2025 and Birmingham 2026, Harry Beevor and Connor Green lost 1:16 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:14 quicker, so 0:58 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Men, with Connor Green, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:02:46 PB93/600Beat 85%
↑ 374 days after Birmingham 2025, with Connor Green 1:16 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:58 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:14 faster for everyone, so 1:16 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:14 faster This pair0:58 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:11:28 PB201/279Beat 28%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:03:44211/1177Beat 82%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:05:54320/947Beat 66%
↑ 138 days after Birmingham 2024, with Oliver Gedlek 2:33 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:33 better than the field: 5:24 faster on the clock, against 2:51 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:51 faster This pair5:24 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Men1:11:18210/441Beat 52%
-
Malaga13 Apr 2024Doubles Open · Men1:12:15205/332Beat 38%