Progress against the field
From Manchester 2025 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 2:44 on Will Ladbury and Anthony Pullen.
The clock says 2:41 faster, but the races themselves got 5:25 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Men, with Anthony Pullen, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Relay · Men55:048/79Beat 90%
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:00:47 PB38/312Beat 88%
↑ 546 days after London 2025, with Anthony Pullen 0:51 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:11 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:02 faster for everyone, so 0:51 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:02 faster This pair2:11 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:10:16143/404Beat 65%
↑ 690 days after Glasgow 2024, with Ant Pullen 3:59 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:48 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:11 faster for everyone: 3:59 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:11 faster This pair2:48 slower -
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Men1:02:58173/1010Beat 83%
↑ 99 days after Manchester 2025, with Anthony Pullen 1:53 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:30 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:23 faster for everyone, so 1:53 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:23 faster This pair0:30 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Men1:03:28111/616Beat 82%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Men1:07:28215/787Beat 73%