Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2024 and Glasgow 2025, Michael Quigley lost 7:18 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 6:35 quicker, so 0:43 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:10:25 PB144/404Beat 64%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:28:451023/1588Beat 36%
↑ 375 days after Glasgow 2024 7:18 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:43 slower on the clock in a race that was 6:35 faster for everyone: 7:18 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →6:35 faster This athlete0:43 slower -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:30:32673/719Beat 6%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Men1:14:52513/875Beat 41%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Men1:28:02 PB976/1784Beat 45%
-
Dublin28 Oct 2023Doubles Open · Men1:11:35133/350Beat 62%
↑ 259 days after Glasgow 2023, with Steven Morley 1:35 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:02 slower on the clock, but the race was 2:37 slower for everyone, so this was 1:35 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:37 slower This pair1:02 slower -
Glasgow11 Feb 2023Doubles Open · Men1:10:33173/343Beat 50%