Progress against the field
From Malaga 2025 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 1:38 on Christopher Jackson and Dean Mckinney.
Over the same races everyone got 3:00 quicker, so 1:22 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
3 races · 3 events
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:31:52355/404Beat 12%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:13:17 PB1202/2102Beat 43%
↑ 258 days after Malaga 2025, with Dean Mckinney 1:38 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:22 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:00 faster for everyone, so 1:38 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:00 faster This pair1:22 faster -
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:14:39437/704Beat 38%