Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2025 to Manchester 2026, the field gained 2:18 on Megan Connor and Hannah Taylor.
The clock says 0:33 faster, but the races themselves got 2:51 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:12:36127/1155Beat 89%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2025, with Hannah Taylor 1:47 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:59 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:12 slower for everyone: 1:47 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:12 slower This pair1:59 slower -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:10:37 PB69/1111Beat 94%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025, with Hannah Taylor 0:39 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:39 better than the field: 1:51 faster on the clock, against 1:12 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:12 faster This pair1:51 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:12:2832/247Beat 87%
↑ 79 days after Glasgow 2025, with Hannah Taylor 1:10 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:41 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:51 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:10 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:51 faster This pair0:41 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:13:09102/1051Beat 90%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:18:59288/973Beat 70%