Progress against the field
Sophie Wollaston has dropped 1:12 behind the field from Glasgow 2025 to London Excel 2025.
The clock says 5:49 faster, but the races themselves got 7:01 quicker for everyone.
The biggest step was London 2025 → Rome 2025: 2:27 on the field in 146 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:14:50 PB196/1155Beat 83%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:30:37 PB608/1379Beat 56%
↑ 69 days after Rome 2025 1:26 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:22 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:48 faster for everyone, so 1:26 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:48 faster This athlete2:22 faster -
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Open · Women1:32:59282/520Beat 46%
↑ 146 days after London 2025 2:27 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:27 better than the field: 4:30 faster on the clock, against 2:03 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:03 faster This athlete4:30 faster -
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:37:29876/1368Beat 36%
↑ 52 days after Glasgow 2025 2:13 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:13 behind the field: 1:03 slower on the clock, against 1:10 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:10 faster This athlete1:03 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:36:26516/830Beat 38%