Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2022 to Manchester 2026, the field gained 3:40 on Kathleen Walker and Nattie James.
Over the same races everyone got 5:33 quicker, so 1:53 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:22:17448/1155Beat 61%
↑ 453 days after Birmingham 2024, with Nattie James 0:43 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:43 better than the field: 3:45 faster on the clock, against 3:02 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:02 faster This pair3:45 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:30:27 PB55/65Beat 15%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:26:02539/973Beat 45%
↑ 370 days after Birmingham 2023, with Nattie James 6:09 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:01 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:08 faster for everyone: 6:09 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:08 faster This pair4:01 slower -
London26 Nov 2023Doubles Open · Mixed1:30:38 PB719/909Beat 21%
-
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Doubles Open · Women1:22:01 PB182/460Beat 60%
↑ 371 days after Birmingham 2022, with Nattie James 1:46 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:09 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:23 faster for everyone, so 1:46 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →0:23 faster This pair2:09 faster -
Birmingham15 Oct 2022Doubles Open · Women1:24:10156/309Beat 50%