Progress against the field
From Cardiff 2025 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 4:35 on Ryan Pegg.
Over the same races everyone got 5:25 quicker, so 0:50 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 331 days between London Excel 2025 and Birmingham 2026, cost 2:32 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 4 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:19:37535/1442Beat 63%
↑ 331 days after London Excel 2025 2:32 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:09 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:23 faster for everyone: 2:32 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:23 faster This athlete1:09 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:11:27 PB412/794Beat 48%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:48:26 PB1411/1474Beat 4%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:18:28 PB1063/2779Beat 62%
↑ 188 days after Cardiff 2025 2:03 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:59 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:02 faster for everyone, so 2:03 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:02 faster This athlete1:59 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:20:27274/639Beat 57%