Progress against the field
From Heerenveen 2025 to Maastricht 2026, the field gained 7:09 on Roy Pijpker and Megan Nastase.
Over the same races everyone got 1:22 quicker, so 5:47 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Mixed, with Megan Nastase, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:28:22288/444Beat 35%
↑ 498 days after Heerenveen 2025, with Megan Nastase 7:09 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:47 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:22 faster for everyone: 7:09 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:22 faster This pair5:47 slower -
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:07:35 PB104/342Beat 70%
↑ 468 days after Amsterdam 2024, with Jordy Pijpker 1:38 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:25 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 5:03 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:38 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:03 faster This pair3:25 faster -
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Men1:26:19289/354Beat 18%
-
Heerenveen9 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:22:35 PB275/492Beat 44%
-
Amsterdam10 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Men1:11:00258/855Beat 70%
-
Maastricht20 Jan 2024Doubles Open · Men1:13:17114/288Beat 60%